1 i
“ION OF NAVA RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR760-14
2 Sep 14
This is in reference |to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to tke provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
2 September 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordan¢:e with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Bourd consisted of your application, together with
all material submitt(:d in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 29 July
2014, a copy of whic is attached.
After careful and coiscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that) the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existeaice of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The nanes and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action carnot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not |previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to) demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: NPC memo dtd 29 Jul 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3043 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0541 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC memo dated 11 April 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0449 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser a13/101 dated 3 April 2014, a copy of which is attached. consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR059 15
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. Additionally, the Board considered your response to the Advisory Opinion dated 24 February 2015. : After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3974 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR3974-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3321 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC (memo. NR3321-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3978 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3978-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4714 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9029 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is - on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR939 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 23 June 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...